<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OSPF MTU Mismatch Issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ine.com/2008/01/08/ospf-mtu-mismatch-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/01/08/ospf-mtu-mismatch-issue/</link>
	<description>Helping you become a Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:47:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wassim</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/01/08/ospf-mtu-mismatch-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-114317</link>
		<dc:creator>Wassim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/01/08/ospf-mtu-mismatch-issue/#comment-114317</guid>
		<description>I have two ADSL access links connected in a point-to-multipoint fashion to the service provider router. My routers were stuck at OSPF Exstart state. 
I read from Cisco that &quot;ip ospf mtu-ignore&quot; command was rare in its usage. But I put it and immediately my OSPF neighborship went DONE !
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have two ADSL access links connected in a point-to-multipoint fashion to the service provider router. My routers were stuck at OSPF Exstart state.<br />
I read from Cisco that &#8220;ip ospf mtu-ignore&#8221; command was rare in its usage. But I put it and immediately my OSPF neighborship went DONE !<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Mulheirn</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/01/08/ospf-mtu-mismatch-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-18604</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Mulheirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/01/08/ospf-mtu-mismatch-issue/#comment-18604</guid>
		<description>In answer to the question about which device to enter the command &#039;ip ospf mtu-ignore&#039; on, you need it on the one with the smaller MTU.

Basically, the one with the smaller MTU is getting DBD (DataBase Descriptor) messages from the other device that indicate a bigger MTU than the local device is capable of handling.  So the local device ignores the packets.

HTH

Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In answer to the question about which device to enter the command &#8216;ip ospf mtu-ignore&#8217; on, you need it on the one with the smaller MTU.</p>
<p>Basically, the one with the smaller MTU is getting DBD (DataBase Descriptor) messages from the other device that indicate a bigger MTU than the local device is capable of handling.  So the local device ignores the packets.</p>
<p>HTH</p>
<p>Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daghighi</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/01/08/ospf-mtu-mismatch-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-1012</link>
		<dc:creator>daghighi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/01/08/ospf-mtu-mismatch-issue/#comment-1012</guid>
		<description>I usually use solution B, but in some cases, it was enough to configure &quot;ip ospf mtu-ignore&quot; on the switch, and in some other cases, I had to configure &quot;ip ospf mtu-ignore&quot; on both the switch AND the router.

I had not been able to identify why. Any hint ?

Thanks,
Navid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually use solution B, but in some cases, it was enough to configure &#8220;ip ospf mtu-ignore&#8221; on the switch, and in some other cases, I had to configure &#8220;ip ospf mtu-ignore&#8221; on both the switch AND the router.</p>
<p>I had not been able to identify why. Any hint ?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Navid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladimir</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/01/08/ospf-mtu-mismatch-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/01/08/ospf-mtu-mismatch-issue/#comment-212</guid>
		<description>Which method is preferred for production environment?
Changing switch system mtu (any side effects?) or &quot;ip ospf mtu-ignore&quot;?

(not taking into account that switch requires reboot to change system mtu, run into it once when IRB bridging on a router to a 3750 switch)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which method is preferred for production environment?<br />
Changing switch system mtu (any side effects?) or &#8220;ip ospf mtu-ignore&#8221;?</p>
<p>(not taking into account that switch requires reboot to change system mtu, run into it once when IRB bridging on a router to a 3750 switch)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
