Benjamin Franklin was quoted as saying “You may delay but time will not“. We may also say that “Email may tolerate delay, but VOIP will not“. Performance Routing (PfR), previously called Optimized Edge Routing (OER), is designed to solve network performance issues, such as delay, that vanilla IP routing can’t. In this blog, we will use the term OER as that is still the command set used.
Petr and the team have created some awesome new labs on OER, including Volume 1, v5 in the IP Routing section. Our workbook content is extensive, has great explanations for everything and is highly recommended it to anyone preparing for the v4 CCIE RS lab.
One of the big challenges for the OER newcomer is knowing what to expect after configuring OER, and how to see measurable results. My intention in this blog post, is to assist the learner by providing a jump start into OER/PfR, by walking you through a solid configuration, and sharing a few critical show and debug commands to verify that OER is working. For you dynamips/GNS3 fans, the configuration may be replicated using (C3725-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(15)T10, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3).
So, how does it work? It is actually very simple. In the world of OER, there are 2 roles. The brains of the operation, called the master controller, and the border router who owns the exit interfaces. There may be multiple border routers. The key is there needs to be at least 2 or more exit points across the borders being managed by a single controller. Although the controller and border can actually run on the same router, I broke it up into separate devices for this blog post. R1 will be the OER Master Controller, and R2 will be the OER Border. Here is the topology.

Single Border (R2), with 2 exit interfaces Tunnel 1 and Tunnel 2.
First we will create key chain on the controller R1. The key is used for communications between the controller and the border.
R1(config)# key chain cisco R1(config-keychain)# key 1 R1(config-keychain-key)# key-string cisco
Next, on R1 we will configure the master controller portion. About 98 % of all the configuration for OER is done on the controller. Here we will enable logging, and specify who the border(s) are, along with which interfaces on the border are exit interfaces to the outside world.
R1(config)#oer master R1(config-oer-mc)#logging R1(config-oer-mc)#border 136.1.12.2 key-chain cisco R1(config-oer-mc-br)#interface Tunnel1 external R1(config-oer-mc-br-if)#interface Tunnel2 external R1(config-oer-mc-br-if)#interface FastEthernet0/0 internal R1(config-oer-mc-br)#exit
Next on the controller, we specify that we will learn prefixes based on throughput and delay, set time periods regarding learning, and tell the controller the network lengths to learn. In this example, due to the small network, we are going to have the controller learn /32 routes. We could also specify a maximum number of prefixes to learn as well. (Note: In a production network, you would not want thousands of static routes for sites visited by users. There is a default maximum, and the default aggregation is /24).
R1(config-oer-mc)#learn R1(config-oer-mc-learn)#throughput R1(config-oer-mc-learn)#delay R1(config-oer-mc-learn)#periodic-interval 1 R1(config-oer-mc-learn)#monitor-period 2 R1(config-oer-mc-learn)#expire after time 30 R1(config-oer-mc-learn)#aggregation-type prefix-length 32 R1(config-oer-mc-learn)#exit
Next, now that we have exited out of “learn mode”, we can configure some of the other properties of the controller, such as how often to make prefix decisions (the backoff period), allow it to put routes in the routing table (mode route control), and choose the best exit interface (mode select-exit best). OER will create /32 static routes that use that use the “best” interface to reach the destination network.
R1(config-oer-mc)#backoff 180 360 R1(config-oer-mc)#mode route control R1(config-oer-mc)#mode select-exit best
A few additional options include how often to make policy decisions, (periodic command), and which policy items are the most important regarding making those policy decisions (resolve commands). Highest priority is 1, and lowest is 10.
R1(config-oer-mc)#periodic 90 R1(config-oer-mc)#resolve loss priority 1 variance 1 R1(config-oer-mc)#resolve delay priority 2 variance 1 R1(config-oer-mc)#resolve utilization priority 3 variance 1 R1(config-oer-mc)#resolve range priority 4
That is it for now on the controller. Let’s visit the border router R2 next. We’ll create the key chain, and tell R2 who the controller is. We will also tell R2 which interface to use for sending an active probe, (in the event the controller requests one). Active probes are one method (from many available within OER) to determine delay.
R2(config)# key chain cisco R2(config-keychain)# key 1 R2(config-keychain-key)# key-string cisco R2(config)#oer border R2(config-oer-br)#local FastEthernet0/0 R2(config-oer-br)#master 136.1.12.1 key-chain cisco R2(config-oer-br)#active-probe address source interface Loopback0
So, how do we verify this? Since we are at R2, let’s start by issuing a show oer border on R2.
R2#show oer border OER BR 136.1.12.2 ACTIVE, MC 136.1.12.1 UP/DOWN: UP 00:00:03, Auth Failures: 0 Conn Status: SUCCESS, PORT: 3949 Version: 2.1 MC Version: 2.1 Exits Fa0/0 INTERNAL Tu1 EXTERNAL Tu2 EXTERNAL R2#
From this we see that we have successfully connected with the controller (R1), and that the controller has told R2 which interfaces are internal and which are external, based on what we configured on R1.
On R1, we can issue a few commands to confirm our configuration and connectivity to our border as well. Any elements shown in the output that we didn’t configure are based on the default settings. Lets jump over to R1 and take a look.
R1#show oer master OER state: ENABLED and ACTIVE Conn Status: SUCCESS, PORT: 3949 Version: 2.1 Number of Border routers: 1 Number of Exits: 2 Number of monitored prefixes: 0 (max 5000) Max prefixes: total 5000 learn 2500 Prefix count: total 0, learn 0, cfg 0 Border Status UP/DOWN AuthFail Version 136.1.12.2 ACTIVE UP 00:00:12 0 2.1 ! Note: Below, items in bold are derived from our configuration. Global Settings: max-range-utilization percent 0 recv 0 mode route metric bgp local-pref 5000 mode route metric static tag 5000 trace probe delay 1000 logging Default Policy Settings: backoff 180 360 180 delay relative 50 holddown 300 periodic 90 probe frequency 56 mode route control mode monitor both mode select-exit best loss relative 10 jitter threshold 20 mos threshold 3.60 percent 30 unreachable relative 50 resolve loss priority 1 variance 1 resolve delay priority 2 variance 1 resolve utilization priority 3 variance 1 resolve range priority 4 variance 0 Learn Settings: current state : RETRY time remaining in current state : 26 seconds throughput delay no inside bgp no protocol monitor-period 2 periodic-interval 1 aggregation-type prefix-length 32 prefixes 200 expire after time 30 R1#
As a reference below, on R2, here are the IP addresses and Interfaces in use. Note, that Serial 0/0 is used only as a transport for the GRE tunnels.
R2#show ip int brief | ex una Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol FastEthernet0/0 136.1.12.2 YES NVRAM up up Serial0/0 136.1.23.2 YES NVRAM up up Loopback0 150.1.2.2 YES NVRAM up up Tunnel1 10.0.0.2 YES NVRAM up up Tunnel2 20.0.0.2 YES NVRAM up up R2#
Here is the initial routing table on R2, (before OER has dynamically learned routes). We have only 2 static routes, which originated from the startup configuration.
R2#show ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is 20.0.0.3 to network 0.0.0.0
136.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
C 136.1.12.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
C 136.1.23.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0
20.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 20.0.0.0 is directly connected, Tunnel2
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 10.0.0.0 is directly connected, Tunnel1
150.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 150.1.2.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 20.0.0.3
[1/0] via 10.0.0.3
R2#
R2#show run | inc route
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.3
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 20.0.0.3
Now for the fun part. (Really!:) Lets generate some traffic in the background, and allow OER to dynamically learn the specific routes, as well as learn the best path to those routes and watch those routes be added to the routing table on R2. We’ll create two SLAs from R1 directed to the loopbacks of R4 and R5.
R1
R1(config)#ip sla 1 R1(config-ip-sla)#tcp-connect 150.1.4.4 4000 R1(config-ip-sla-tcp)#timeout 100 R1(config-ip-sla-tcp)#frequency 1 R1(config-ip-sla-tcp)#exit R1(config)#ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now R1(config)# R1(config)#ip sla 2 R1(config-ip-sla)#tcp-connect 150.1.5.5 5000 R1(config-ip-sla-tcp)#timeout 100 R1(config-ip-sla-tcp)#frequency 1 R1(config-ip-sla-tcp)#exit R1(config)#ip sla schedule 2 life forever start-time now
On R4 and R5, we need to set up the SLA responder, so they will respond correctly to the tcp-connect requests sourced from R1.
R4 and R5
R4(config)#ip sla responder R5(config)#ip sla responder
On R2, lets see what networks have been learned. (Note: Based on the timers, it may take a ~minute or so for the /32 networks of 150.1.4.4 and 150.1.5.5 to be learned. I waited at least a couple minutes before issuing the commands below. You may want to verify that your SLA traffic is reaching R4 and R5 if you need to troubleshoot).
R2#show oer border passive cache prefix OER Passive Prefix Cache, State: enabled, 278544 bytes 4 active, 4092 inactive, 1222 added 67316 ager polls, 0 flow alloc failures Active flows timeout in 1 minutes Inactive flows timeout in 15 seconds IP Sub Flow Cache, 25800 bytes 12 active, 1012 inactive, 3666 added, 1222 added to flow 0 alloc failures, 0 force free 1 chunk, 30 chunks added 0 flows not aggregated due to main subcache starvation Prefix NextHop Src If Dst If Flows Pkts B/Pk Active sDly #Dly PktLos #UnRch ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 150.1.4.4/32 0.0.0.0 Tu1 Fa0/0 24 34 38 18.5 0 0 0 0 150.1.5.5/32 0.0.0.0 Tu1 Fa0/0 24 34 38 18.1 0 0 0 0 150.1.4.4/32 20.0.0.3 Fa0/0 Tu2 23 35 62 18.5 64 5 0 0 150.1.5.5/32 20.0.0.3 Fa0/0 Tu2 23 35 62 18.1 84 5 0 0 R2#
Now, lets turn on a debug of active probes on the border, and see what we can learn from it.
R2#debug oer border active-probes detail <snip> OER BR APE detail: Completed retrieving Probe Statistics. probeType = echo, probeTarget = 150.1.4.4, probeTargetPort = 0 probeSource = 150.1.2.2, probeSourcePort = 0, probeNextHop = 10.0.0.3 probeIfIndex = 10, SAA index = 339 probeToS = 0 policy_seq = 0 OER BR APE detail: Completions 2, Sum of rtt 40, Max rtt 24, Min rtt 16 <snip> OER BR APE detail: Completed retrieving Probe Statistics. probeType = echo, probeTarget = 150.1.4.4, probeTargetPort = 0 probeSource = 150.1.2.2, probeSourcePort = 0, probeNextHop = 20.0.0.3 probeIfIndex = 11, SAA index = 340 probeToS = 0 policy_seq = 0 OER BR APE detail: Completions 2, Sum of rtt 52, Max rtt 28, Min rtt 24
Based on this, the rtt values from Tunnel 1 (using 10.0.0.3 as the next hop to reach 150.1.4.4) are lower than Tunnel 2 (which is using 20.0.0.3 as the next hop). As a result, OER believes that Tunnel 1 is the best path and will inject a static /32 route for destination 150.1.4.4, using Tunnel 1 as the exit interface and 10.0.0.3 as the next hop. A similar result was discovered for 150.1.5.5 as well. As a result, both /32 routes are dynamically added to the routing table on R2.
R2#show ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is 20.0.0.3 to network 0.0.0.0
136.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
C 136.1.12.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
C 136.1.23.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0
20.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 20.0.0.0 is directly connected, Tunnel2
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 10.0.0.0 is directly connected, Tunnel1
150.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks
C 150.1.2.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
! OER dynamically added the 2 static routes below
S 150.1.5.5/32 [1/0] via 10.0.0.3
S 150.1.4.4/32 [1/0] via 10.0.0.3
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 20.0.0.3
[1/0] via 10.0.0.3
R2#
Also, on R1, the controller, there were a couple messages logged:
%OER_MC-5-NOTICE: Route changed Prefix 150.1.5.5/32, BR 136.1.12.2, i/f Tu1, Reason Delay, OOP Reason Timer Expired %OER_MC-5-NOTICE: Route changed Prefix 150.1.4.4/32, BR 136.1.12.2, i/f Tu1, Reason Delay, OOP Reason Timer Expired
So now that OER has decided that Tunnel 1, using 10.0.0.3 is the best path for those 2 networks, lets tip the scale in the other direction by using generic traffic shaping on Tunnel 1, so that the delay there will be worse than Tunnel 2, and watch the results. (Note: in addition to the generic traffic shaping on R2 Tunnel 1, I also ran an extended ping sourced from 150.1.4.4 and 150.1.5.5 to increase the overall delay).
R2(config-if)#traffic-shape rate 8000 1000 0 R2(config-if)#do show traffic-shape Interface Tu1 Access Target Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment Adapt VC List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes) Active - 8000 125 1000 0 125 125 - R2# ! Below is debug output showing Tunnel 2 with next hop of 20.0.0.3 ! as having the least delay for destination 150.1.4.4 ... OER BR APE detail: Completed retrieving Probe Statistics. probeType = echo, probeTarget = 150.1.4.4, probeTargetPort = 0 probeSource = 150.1.2.2, probeSourcePort = 0, probeNextHop = 10.0.0.3 probeIfIndex = 10, SAA index = 363 probeToS = 0 policy_seq = 0 OER BR APE detail: Completions 1, Sum of rtt 88, Max rtt 88, Min rtt 88 OER BR APE detail: Completed retrieving Probe Statistics. probeType = echo, probeTarget = 150.1.4.4, probeTargetPort = 0 probeSource = 150.1.2.2, probeSourcePort = 0, probeNextHop = 20.0.0.3 probeIfIndex = 11, SAA index = 364 probeToS = 0 policy_seq = 0 OER BR APE detail: Completions 1, Sum of rtt 8, Max rtt 8, Min rtt 8 OER BR APE detail: Completed retrieving Probe Statistics. ! Now the debug output for the destination 150.1.5.5 showing ! that Tunnel 2 with next hop of 20.0.0.3 has the least delay .... probeType = echo, probeTarget = 150.1.5.5, probeTargetPort = 0 probeSource = 150.1.2.2, probeSourcePort = 0, probeNextHop = 10.0.0.3 probeIfIndex = 10, SAA index = 365 probeToS = 0 policy_seq = 0 OER BR APE detail: Completions 1, Sum of rtt 72, Max rtt 72, Min rtt 72 OER BR APE detail: Completed retrieving Probe Statistics. probeType = echo, probeTarget = 150.1.5.5, probeTargetPort = 0 probeSource = 150.1.2.2, probeSourcePort = 0, probeNextHop = 20.0.0.3 probeIfIndex = 11, SAA index = 366 probeToS = 0 policy_seq = 0 OER BR APE detail: Completions 1, Sum of rtt 12, Max rtt 12, Min rtt 12
Back on the master controller (R1), we notice the messages:
%OER_MC-5-NOTICE: Route changed Prefix 150.1.4.4/32, BR 136.1.12.2, i/f Tu2, Reason Delay, OOP Reason Timer Expired %OER_MC-5-NOTICE: Route changed Prefix 150.1.5.5/32, BR 136.1.12.2, i/f Tu2, Reason Delay, OOP Reason Timer Expired
On R2 (the border), here is the updated routing table:
R2#show ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is 20.0.0.3 to network 0.0.0.0
136.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
C 136.1.12.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
C 136.1.23.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0
20.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 20.0.0.0 is directly connected, Tunnel2
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 10.0.0.0 is directly connected, Tunnel1
150.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks
C 150.1.2.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
! Note: the next hop has changed, and will use Tunnel 2 as the exit
S 150.1.5.5/32 [1/0] via 20.0.0.3
S 150.1.4.4/32 [1/0] via 20.0.0.3
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 20.0.0.3
[1/0] via 10.0.0.3
R2#
For detailed information regarding OER and the hundreds of options available with it, please leverage the content in our updated V5 RS content.
OER is very fun, and very important. Enjoy your studies, and good luck!
Keith.
About Keith Barker, CCIE #6783:
Keith Barker excelled as a Network Engineer beginning in 1986 with EDS. Before opting for a career in IT Education, Keith’s practical experience culminated with the position of IT Manager for Paramount Pictures. Once joining the field of IT Education, Keith became a top-rated Microsoft and Cisco Certified Instructor. Keith Barker, along with Jeremy Cioara and Anthony Sequeira helped to make KnowledgeNet, the most respected Online IT Training organization of its time. You will find Keith Barker in Live Classroom, Live Online, and Self-Paced Route/Switch and Security classes here at INE.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
12 Responses to “OER/PfR… it’s always watching.”
Leave a Reply

Awesomeee thanks Guys
Keith u r so great i was actually waiting for something related to PfR
Very informative. Thx. One question for you. Why did you set the active-probe interfaces if you are doing PASSIVE learning via netflow and not ACTIVE via ip sla?
Very nice,
I think the “ip sla” feature is there only to generate traffic. Do you confirm this keith ?
Bruno
Bruno- Yes. The 2 IP SLAs that were set up, were to only generate traffic.
Hello Gary- great question!
From the OER learning perspective, prefixes are learned on the border routers through monitoring the traffic flow using the embedded NetFlow capability.
From the monitoring perspective, for each aggregated prefix, (in our case, /32 prefixes) up to five host addresses are selected to use as active probe targets. (In our case, it is the 32 bit host address that represents the /32 prefix that is being used for the active probe.)
In our example, I used a couple SLAs to generate some traffic (separate from OER) so the learning would begin. NetFlow and IP SLAs are enabled automatically within OER. We can use both active and passive monitoring methods at the same time.
The master controller uses both passive and active monitoring by default (mode monitor both). All traffic classes are passively monitored using integrated NetFlow functionality. Out-of-policy traffic classes are actively monitored using IP SLA functionality. Out of policy (OOP) can be due to the timer expiring, loss, delay, utilization etc.
Thanks for the question.
Hi,
great article, finding good information on how to configure OER seems to be pretty rare!
One question though, whenever I have configured OER in my lab, I have always had to manually enable netflow on the border routers in order for it to identify prefixes.
How come you have not done this in this example? is it just ingress netflow on the external intefaces you need and do you also need to enable top talkers on the border routers?
Hey Keith,
I guess I am still a bit confused. Lets pretend that you never specified a source interface to send active probes from on the BR’s, would we only be doing PASSIVE monitoring on the prefixes that you have learned via NETFLOW?
I thought that to do ACTIVE you actually have to do: “active-probe tcp-conn 150.1.1.1 target-port 23″ on the MC.
If I am understanding you correctly, then your saying that since “monitor mode both” is on, we are indeed doing ACTIVE and PASSIVE even though no active-probes have been configured?
Thanks for the clarification.
Hi, Really great article. Thank you Keith
Gary- Which interface will your router use to source PING, TACACS sessions, Telnet, SSH, etc?
The answer is, without external forces, the closest interface to the destination. By removing the command “active-probe address source interface Loopback0″ from the border router won’t stop the active probes, it will simply source the traffic from the 2 tunnel interfaces (1 per probe) instead of the loopback 0.
So, yes, we are indeed doing active and passive even though no active probes have been configured.
Chris- The OER process internally uses netflow, without requiring us to administratively turn netflow on.
I looked at my config on R2, and I did have top-talkers enabled, but it was for another project I was working in. I turned off top-talkers, shut the border and master, restarted both, and everything still worked the same.
The netflow feature used by OER is “automagic”.
Hi Keith
Really good article, v well written, thanks!
Hi,
i have problem about implementing the OER. i can’t inject the static route into routing table. FYI, i use EIGRP routing protocol.
When i type sh oer master traffic-class, the status is uncontrolled (DEFAULT*)
what should i do to solve this problem.
sh oer master traffic-class
OER Prefix Statistics:
Pas – Passive, Act – Active, S – Short term, L – Long term, Dly – Delay (ms),
P – Percentage below threshold, Jit – Jitter (ms),
MOS – Mean Opinion Score
Los – Packet Loss (packets-per-million), Un – Unreachable (flows-per-million),
E – Egress, I – Ingress, Bw – Bandwidth (kbps), N – Not applicable
U – unknown, * – uncontrolled, + – control more specific, @ – active probe all
# – Prefix monitor mode is Special, & – Blackholed Prefix
% – Force Next-Hop, ^ – Prefix is denied
DstPrefix Appl_ID Dscp Prot SrcPort DstPort SrcPrefix
Flags State Time CurrBR CurrI/F Protocol
PasSDly PasLDly PasSUn PasLUn PasSLos PasLLos EBw IBw
ActSDly ActLDly ActSUn ActLUn ActSJit ActPMOS ActSLos ActLLos
——————————————————————————–
10.14.199.56/30 N defa N N N N
DEFAULT* 53 10.14.254.209 Fa0/0 U
U U 0 1000000 0 0 0 0
U U 0 0 N N N N
10.14.167.92/30 N defa N N N N
DEFAULT* 10 10.14.254.209 Fa0/0 U
U U 0 1000000 0 0 0 0
U U 0 0 N N N N
10.14.207.0/30 N defa N N N N
DEFAULT* 54 10.14.254.209 Fa0/0 U
U U 1000000 1000000 0 0 1 0
U U 0 0 N N N N
10.14.119.100/30 N defa N N N N
DEFAULT* 30 10.14.254.209 Fa0/0 U
U U 0 1000000 0 0 0 0
U U 0 0 N N N N
10.14.246.244/30 N defa N N N N
DEFAULT* 63 10.14.254.209 Fa0/0 U
U U 1000000 1000000 0 0 1 0
U U 0 0 N N N N
10.14.63.216/30 N defa N N N N
DEFAULT* 25 10.14.254.209 Fa0/0 U
U U 0 1000000 0 0 0 0
U U 0 0 N N N N
10.14.95.132/30 N defa N N N N
DEFAULT* 26 10.14.254.209 Fa0/0 U
U U 1000000 1000000 0 0 1 0
–More– U U 0 0 N N N N
10.14.39.196/30 N defa N N N N
DEFAULT* 59 10.14.254.209 Fa0/0 U
U U 0 1000000 0 0 0 0
U U 0 0 N N N N
10.14.199.48/30 N defa N N N N
DEFAULT* 25 10.14.254.209 Fa0/0 U
U U 1000000 1000000 0 0 1 0
U U 0 0 N N N N
10.14.207.56/30 N defa N N N N
DEFAULT* 21 10.14.254.209 Fa0/0 U
U U 0 1000000 0 0 0 0
U U 0 0 N N N N
10.14.143.112/30 N defa N N N N
DEFAULT* 2 10.14.254.209 Fa0/0 U
U U 0 1000000 0 0 0 0
U U 0 0 N N N N
10.14.55.212/30 N defa N N N N
DEFAULT* 85 10.14.254.209 Fa0/0 U
U U 0 1000000 0 0 0 0
U U 0 0 N N N N
10.14.95.184/30 N defa N N N N
DEFAULT* 70 10.14.254.209 Fa0/0 U
U U 0 1000000 0 0 0 0
U U 0 0 N N N N
10.14.135.108/30 N defa N N N N
DEFAULT* 21 10.14.254.209 Fa0/0 U
U U 1000000 1000000 0 0 1 0
U U 0 0 N N N N
10.14.223.12/30 N defa N N N N
DEFAULT* 7 10.14.254.209 Fa0/0 U
U U 1000000 1000000 0 0 1 0
U U 0 0 N N N N
10.14.31.244/30 N defa N N N N
DEFAULT* 89 10.14.254.209 Fa0/0 U
U U 0 1000000 0 0 0 0
U U 0 0 N N N N
i want to ask about injecting the static route into routing t