blog
    WLAN Security - WEP
    16 October 10

    WLAN Security - WEP

    Posted byINE
    facebooktwitterlinkedin
    news-featured

    In this series of blog posts, we will examine WLAN security mechanisms in an even greater detail than in our popular 5-Day CCNA Wireless course. We will begin with one that is now considered legacy due to major weaknesses that were quickly discovered in its implementation.

    We Don't Need No Stinken' Wires!

    This security mechanism receives the least coverage in the CCNA Wireless materials and exam, because, as we stated, it is indeed considered legacy. The official title for this technology is Preshared Key Authentication with Wired Equivalent Privacy. This name tells us a lot. We are not really truly authenticating someone using this approach, we are just ensuring that they possess a piece of information, the preshared key (password). Notice the Wired Equivalent Privacy portion of the name tells us that the creators of the technology were really trying to sell it to WLAN designers and implementers!

    The WEP process consists of a series of steps as follows:

    1. The wireless client sends an authentication request.
    2. The Access Point (AP) sends an authentication response containing clear-text (uh-oh!) challenge text.
    3. The client takes the challenge text received and encrypts it using a static WEP key.
    4. The client sends the encrypted authentication packet to the AP.
    5. The AP encrypts the challenge text using its own static WEP key and compares the result to the authentication packet sent by the client. If the results match, the AP begins the association process for the wireless client.

    The big issue with WEP is the fact that it is very susceptible to a Man in the Middle attack. The attacker captures the clear-text challenge and then the authentication packet reply. The attacker then reverses the RC4 encryption in order to derive the static WEP key. Yikes!

    As you might guess, the designers attempted to strengthen WEP using the approach of key lengths. The native Windows client supported a 104-bit key as opposed to the initial 40-bit key. The fundamental weaknesses in the WEP process still remained however.

    We hope you are excited to learn more about the next generations WLAN security mechanisms that resulted...

    Hey! Don’t miss anything - subscribe to our newsletter!

    © 2022 INE. All Rights Reserved. All logos, trademarks and registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
    instagram Logofacebook Logotwitter Logolinkedin Logoyoutube Logo